Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Charlottesville Civil Lawfare Shoah Trial

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Charlottesville Civil Lawfare Shoah Trial

    ​The Charlottesville Civil Lawfare Shoah Trial


    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3651#post23651
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3651#post23651
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3651#post23651
    _________________________
    http://www.pastorlindstedt.org/lindstedt
    http://www.whitenationalist.org/forum

  • #2
    ​The Charlottesville Civil Lawfare Shoah Trial Begins


    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3652#post23652
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3652#post23652
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3652#post23652
    Organizer of Charlottesville 1.0



    https://twitter.com/TheMadDimension

    Comment


    • #3
      The Charlottesville Rally Civil Trial, Explained (by the jew yawk times)

      The Charlottesville Rally Civil Trial, Explained (by the jew yawk times)​


      The main organizers of the deadly 2017 white nationalist rally are being sued in federal court. Here’s a guide to what to expect at the trial.



      By Neil MacFarquhar
      Oct. 25, 2021
      Updated 8:38 a.m. ET



      https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/ch...rial-explained
      http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3653#post23653
      http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3653#post23653


      More than four years after hundreds of white nationalists and far-right extremists descended on the city of Charlottesville, Va., in a rally that turned deadly, a civil case that takes aim at the organizers is set to begin in federal court on Monday. Which is today.

      In simple legal terms, the nine plaintiffs — including an ordained minister, a landscape gardener and a lawyer who was a student at the time — are suing 14 men and 10 groups considered the main organizers of the rally, accusing them of violating their civil rights and seeking damages for the injuries they sustained. Just like Bryan Reo and the rest of the ZOGbot Poverty [F]Law Center none of these pretend plaintiffs have any real damages they just want to have an excuse to destroy the Racial Rightunder color of civil lawfare.

      But the conflict in Charlottesville has always been about a lot more than the rally itself. Delayed repeatedly by the coronavirus pandemic, the trial will revisit one of the most searing manifestations of how hatred and intolerance that festers online can spread onto the streets. In short ZOG wants to criminalize "haet speech" over the Internuts and destroy open dissent, never realizing that doing so guarantees open racial and religious civil war.

      Although the events prompted a few criminal cases, including one that resulted in a murder conviction, the plaintiffs’ lawyers say they decided to act after there was no broader federal or state effort to hold the organizers accountable for the violence that ensued. They are also seeking to deter others from organizing similar events. In other words, this is civil lawfare organized by jews and niggers and gliberal whiggers against the alt-kike fake Racial-Right.

      In the fallout from the 2017 rally, most of the 14 defendants have lost their leadership positions in their far-right groups, many of which have either dissolved or rebranded in an attempt to distance themselves from the events. If the plaintiffs prevail, their chances of collecting damages appear slim, given that some of the defendants are representing themselves because they cannot afford lawyers. Unless, as with Pastor Lindstedt they have assets which can be seized through this going through the state and federal regime korts these ZOGbot "leaders" don't have a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of. Nor should lawyers be used as one of the goals of any real Racial Right is to exterminate the lawyers as a class because a local theocratic military dictatorship run like a Klan doesn't need such.

      The main argument of the defendants is that their views constitute free speech, and that any violence stemmed from self-defense against attacks by counterprotesters. Which is true, but irrelevant. ZOG is after taking the shit of these ZOGbot "leaders".

      .

      What happened in Charlottesville?

      The Charlottesville march on Aug. 12, 2017, known as the “Unite the Right” rally, was organized to protest the planned removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee from a park at the city center. It was the third and by far the largest such protest since the previous May.

      On the eve of the rally, about 300 mostly white men staged a torch-lit march on the University of Virginia campus. They chanted racist, antisemitic slogans like “You will not replace us!” and “Jews will not replace us!” The march evoked rallies held by the Ku Klux Klan and by Nazi Germany.

      The first clashes between the rally participants and about 30 counterdemonstrators erupted that night. The skirmishing continued the next day as adherents of the far right gathered at a downtown park carrying shields, clubs and various white nationalist flags.

      The police did not intervene but eventually declared an unlawful assembly, pushing the protesters out of the city center.

      The events culminated with James Fields Jr., then a 20-year-old neo-Nazi, driving his Dodge Challenger into a crowd of counterprotesters, killing Heather Heyer, 32, and leaving at least 19 others injured, four of whom are plaintiffs in the lawsuit.

      — Neil MacFarquhar


      Were there other criminal cases? Why is this a civil case?

      Four white nationalists were sentenced to up to eight years in jail for beating a Black man in a parking garage during the Charlottesville rally. Police made very few arrests, an independent review of events determined, but several far-right protesters and counterprotesters were convicted on various charges including assault or disorderly conduct for pepper spray and other attacks against the other side.

      James Fields Jr. was sentenced to multiple life sentences in federal prison for killing Heather Heyer when he drove his car into the crowd during the Charlottesville protests.

      But no larger federal or state cases materialized. In what was taken as a nod of approval, President Donald J. Trump, when asked about the violence, said there were “very fine people on both sides.”

      The lawyers and others behind the civil case say they felt that the organizers were not being held accountable for spreading hate.

      “Civil litigation allows us to hold those responsible for violence accountable in a way that other tools do not,” Elizabeth Sines, a law student at the time of the attack and the lead plaintiff, wrote in a 2019 email interview. “If you plan and execute violence — toward Jewish people, people of color, diverse communities like Charlottesville — you will be held responsible for your actions.”


      What is the civil case?

      To pursue the organizers of the Charlottesville rally, lawyers are relying on 21st-century technology as well as a somewhat obscure law from the Civil War era that has gained popularity in recent years. It is one of the few laws that allows people to accuse fellow citizens, rather than the government, of depriving them of their civil rights.

      The federal law from 1871 is often called the Ku Klux Klan Act because it was designed to prevent the Klan from denying freed slaves their civil rights. Its provisions even outlawed moving about “in disguise upon the public highway” in order to deprive anyone of equal protection under the law.

      Aside from the Charlottesville case, a federal lawsuit directed at some of the main participants in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot invokes the act.

      The law specifies that any violence must be plotted in advance, which is why proving a prior conspiracy is crucial to the Charlottesville lawsuit.

      The lawyers say the case rests on chat conversations from Discord, a platform for game enthusiasts, as well as a raft of text messages, tweets and other social media posts that discuss fomenting violence. The Discord chats were published by Unicorn Riot, an alternative media website. The discussions overflow with derogatory remarks about Black people, Jews and activists from movements like Black Lives Matter and antifa.

      In the Charlottesville case, Judge Norman K. Moon of Federal District Court cited the Ku Klux Klan Act in rejecting the defendants’ attempt to have the lawsuit dismissed on First Amendment grounds.

      .

      Who are the plaintiffs?

      The plaintiffs in the Charlottesville rally lawsuit are a cross-section of Virginia residents — an ordained minister, a landscaper, several students. In addition to claiming that a conspiracy deprived them of their civil rights, they are seeking damages for injuries, lost income and severe emotional distress.

      Elizabeth Sines, the lead plaintiff, witnessed both the march, with its racist chants, and the car plowing into the crowd of counterprotesters the next day.

      “The trauma will never go away,” she said in an interview. “Among other things, I will always be on high alert when I’m in a large crowd and I’ll always have nightmares — of the car attack, of torchlight rallies. I’ll be scared forever. But the events from that weekend have reaffirmed for me how important it is to show up.”

      Plaintiffs from the vehicle attack sustained a variety of injuries, according to court papers. Marcus Martin, the landscaper, suffered a broken leg and a badly fractured ankle. The pain has made his landscaping work difficult and he has been unable to resume playing softball.

      Some 35 lawyers are donating their time to the plaintiffs, while other costs are being met through the fund-raising efforts of a nonprofit organization called Integrity First for America.

      .

      Who is being sued? And what is their defense?
      .

      The defendants in the Charlottesville rally civil case are drawn from a range of white nationalist or neo-Nazi organizations, and include far-right figures like Richard B. Spencer, Jason Kessler and Christopher Cantwell.

      They and their lawyers have argued in interviews and in court papers that while others might find their views reprehensible, they were exercising their First Amendment right to self-expression. Any discussion before the rally about violence came only in the context of self-defense, they said.

      George Rutherglen, a professor at the University of Virginia Law School, cast doubt on the idea that free speech would prove a strong defense. “I don’t think the First Amendment is going to get them very far in defending racially discriminatory confrontations and violence,” he said. “You have no First Amendment right to go out to attack people based on race.”

      The 14 individuals and 10 organizations do not have a uniform defense. A few have ignored the proceedings or destroyed materials requested in discovery, provoking fines, court sanctions or default judgments that already link them to a conspiracy.

      The defense lawyers either declined or did not respond to requests for comment.

      Mr. Spencer drew considerable attention for his notorious “Hail Trump! Hail our people! Hail victory!” speech in Washington, D.C., in November 2016.

      Mr. Spencer is among at least five defendants representing themselves. He told the court last year that the case had been “financially crippling” because so many fund-raising platforms booted him off and he could not afford his lawyer.

      His lack of contact with other organizers showed a “glaring absence of evidence” linking him to a conspiracy, Mr. Spencer wrote in an email.

      Mr. Kessler, who is from Charlottesville, sought to parlay the rally into a leadership position in the far right. He said the march was meant to defend white history and sought to blame the violence on the police for not separating the “Unite the Right” participants from leftist counterprotesters.

      Other participants have continued to espouse extremist views. Mr. Cantwell, the former host of a neo-Nazi talk show online, said in court papers that the defendants were basically on trial for being white men and he tried to bar expert testimony on white supremacy and has questioned the Holocaust. Mr. Cantwell was sentenced to more than three years in prison this year, having been convicted of extortion after he threatened to rape another man’s wife amid a feud among far-right groups.

      Various groups named in the lawsuit have disbanded entirely or rebranded in an attempt to put Charlottesville behind them. At least two prominent neo-Nazis have denounced their pasts, leading to accusations that they were trying to wriggle out of the suit.

      “Broadly, all the groups in Charlottesville have burned up in the aftermath of the event,” said Michael Edison Hayden, a spokesman for the Southern Poverty Law Center.

      If the jury awards the plaintiffs substantial damages, the case could follow many of the defendants around for decades. Not even bankruptcy would erase the amount owed.

      .

      Is the case expected to have an impact beyond the fate of the defendants?
      .
      Both the Department of Homeland Security and the F.B.I. have identified domestic extremism as the greatest current threat to the United States. The case will spotlight how far-right movements thrive online, and how they managed to move offline to stage the Charlottesville rally.

      Since then, the event has been overshadowed by the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, but some of the same ideology was at play there, with members of far-right groups like the Proud Boys, street brawlers who call themselves “Western chauvinists,” and the Oath Keepers, a paramilitary organization, accused of playing a prominent role in organizing the attack.

      Many Americans are unaware of the threat from the far right because so much of it builds up online, where they do not see it, said Karen L. Dunn, a lead lawyer for the plaintiffs.

      “By the time we see it, it has the potential to create tremendous injury and instability, and I think it was true both in Charlottesville and on Jan. 6,” she said.

      .

      ____________________________
      I am The Librarian
      http://whitenationalist.org/forum/
      http://www.pastorlindstedt.org/forum/

      Comment


      • #4
        The Charlottesville ‘Unite the Right’ trial begins today. Here’s what you need to know.

        The Charlottesville ‘Unite the Right’ trial begins today. Here’s what you need to know. (Washington Post)

        By Ellie Silverman
        Today at 6:00 a.m. EDT|Updated today at 11:00 a.m. EDT


        https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md...rally-lawsuit/
        http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3663#post23663
        http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3663#post23663

        On the night of Aug. 11, 2017, a crowd of mostly young White males wearing khaki pants and polos marched with rage at the University of Virginia, carrying torches and chanting “Jews will not replace us.”

        The next morning, white supremacists wielding weapons, including shields, clubs and long guns, descended on downtown Charlottesville along with self-styled militia members carrying semiautomatic rifles and pistols. A neo-Nazi sped his car into a crowd, killing 32-year-old counterprotester Heather Heyer and injuring at least 19 others.

        It was a weekend of rage, hate, violence and death in Charlottesville four years ago — one that awakened much of this country to a resurgence of far-right extremism and that President Biden has said inspired him to run for president.

        Jury selection has begun for a federal civil trial in Charlottesville, where jurors will decide whether the organizing of the “Unite the Right” rally amounted to a conspiracy to engage in racially motivated violence. The trial is scheduled to last until Nov. 19. Here’s what you need to know.

        .

        Why are white supremacists on trial?

        ____________________________
        I am The Librarian
        http://whitenationalist.org/forum/
        http://www.pastorlindstedt.org/forum/

        Comment


        • #5
          Charlottesville Trial Begins Today

          Charlottesville Trial Begins Today


          https://occidentaldissent.com/2021/1...-begins-today/
          http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3654#post23654
          http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3654#post23654


          The quality of people I am reaching is much higher than I ever did with a forum.
          I'm now at the top of the racialist intellectual community in the United States.
          I was a nobody when I ran The Phora.

          Comment


          • #6
            Last edited by PastorLindstedt; 02-06-2022, 10:33 PM. Reason: Formatting error moving to v-bull 5.6.5. from 4.1.4.
            ____________________________
            I am The Librarian
            http://whitenationalist.org/forum/
            http://www.pastorlindstedt.org/forum/

            Comment


            • #7



              http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3677#post23677
              Organizer of Charlottesville 1.0



              https://twitter.com/TheMadDimension

              Comment


              • #8




                http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3679#post23679
                Organizer of Charlottesville 1.0



                https://twitter.com/TheMadDimension

                Comment


                • #9
                  NPR Skank on First Day ofCharlottesville 1.0 Civil "Lawfare" Lynch Trial

                  NPR Skank on First Day of Charlottesville 1.0 Civil "Lawfare" Lynch Trial

                  https://www.npr.org/transcripts/1050177206
                  http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3682#post23682
                  http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3682#post23682

                  Below is some yapping by whiggress skanks about supposed Neo-Nutzi ZOGbots
                  .

                  SARAH MCCAMMON, HOST:

                  Opening arguments began today in the civil trial against far-right extremists associated with the deadly 2017 Unite the Right rally. The long-awaited trial in Charlottesville, Va., is four years in the making. It's been held up by the pandemic and also the struggle to collect evidence from unwilling defendants. Whittney Evans is with Virginia Public Media. She followed today's proceedings and joins us with more. Hi, Whittney.

                  WHITTNEY EVANS, BYLINE: Hi.

                  MCCAMMON: So what has today been like?

                  EVANS: To be honest, it's been so difficult to sit through these opening arguments. They played audio and video of all of the events of August 11 and 12. And it may be difficult to hear, but I'm going to describe some of it now. Extremists are screaming, chanting racist phrases and slogans like, Jews will not replace us. And when they broadcast a recording of avowed neo-Nazi James Alex Fields driving his car into protesters, you could hear the sound of bodies hitting the hood of the car. I had to take a break from this.

                  MCCAMMON: So awful. Remind us, Whittney, how all of this began.

                  EVANS: Back in 2016, Charlottesville was considering taking down Confederate statues, and these white nationalist and neo-Nazi groups started filtering into the city to protest their removal. And it all came to a head in August of 2017 when violence broke out in the streets. Fields killed one woman and injured others with his car. A group of those residents who were injured filed a lawsuit against the organizers. They claim they conspired amongst each other in violation of state and federal law to commit that violence.

                  MCCAMMON: And can you tell us more about this case? What kind of case are the plaintiffs making?

                  EVANS: Well, they say they have ample evidence to prove the defendants - which includes Richard Spencer, who's known for coining the term alt-right, and the Ku Klux Klan and Vanguard America - planned and promoted the violence. They've been collecting evidence over the last four years and have constructed sort of a web to show how the defendants, of which there were more than 20, are all connected to each other and also connected to the violence. For at least one longtime local activist, this case is clear-cut. Jalane Schmidt, who is also a professor here at the University of Virginia, says it was obvious when many of these far-right groups began gathering in town long before the infamous rally.

                  JALANE SCHMIDT: To me, it seems obvious that this was a conspiracy, meaning they were planning this, you know, for months. We saw it here in Charlottesville. We saw it in our streets - a very steady escalation. So yeah, I think there's plenty of evidence.

                  MCCAMMON: OK. And so what is the defense saying?

                  EVANS: Attorneys for the defendants say these people may not be likable, that their language in chat forums may have been violent and hateful, but that they're, quote, "knuckleheads" who couldn't have known what was going to happen in Charlottesville. High-profile defendants, including Richard Spencer and neo-Nazi Christopher Cantwell, are actually representing themselves in this trial. Cantwell was hauled in from federal prison, where he's serving time on unrelated charges.

                  MCCAMMON: Yeah. What has that been like?

                  EVANS: It's made for an unusual sight. The defense is still making their case. But earlier today, Spencer addressed the jurors, telling them, this case isn't about whether you stand with the, quote, "angels or the Nazis." It's about whether you can defend the right of someone you vehemently disagree with - to, quote, "give the bad guy a fair shake." Ultimately, these 12 jurors - for these 12 jurors, this isn't about deciding whether they're bad people but whether they're - whether they violated the law.

                  MCCAMMON: Whittney Evans of Virginia Public Media. Thank you.

                  EVANS: Thank you.

                  NPR Skank Reporter:
                  http://tenthousandwarlords.org/2021/...ille_trial.mp3


                  .

                  ____________________________
                  I am The Librarian
                  http://whitenationalist.org/forum/
                  http://www.pastorlindstedt.org/forum/

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

                    Pastor Lindstedt's Web Page
                    Pastor Lindstedt's Archive Page & Christian Nationalist Forum

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X